On September 2, 2015, the lower court sentenced three top left leaders, Tapas Dutta, Babul Debnath and Trilokesh Singh, to torture on charges of physical torture in the District and Sessions Court of the then South District George on September 2, 2015.
They appealed to the Sessions Court against this order . The session court announced the judgment of the appeal case on Wednesday The session court upheld the order of the lower court given to the three accused As soon as this verdict was announced, there was a sensation in Bilonia.
The three appeal cases which the Sessions Court pronounced are Appeal No. 1, 2022, Appeal No. 2, 2022 and Appeal No. 3, 2022. The subject matter of this case is that on 2/9/2015 the CPIM party called for a 24-hour Bharat Bandh, these three miscreants of the CPIM party entered the court illegally and physically assaulted the then George Rohidas Pal in the district and session court. and abused him with obscene language and used force to leave that court. On hearing of this incident, the SDPO of Bilonia, who was some distance away from the scene, came before the court and saved them from the hands of the three miscreants. The miscreants fled the scene ignoring the police
Later, the SDPO of Bilonia registered a case against the miscreants at the Bilonia police station And after filing the case Bilonia police station OC sub-inspector Shankar Saha charged the investigation of this case. OC Shankar Saha then started investigating the case.
Later after the investigation, accused Tapas Dutta, Trilokesh Singha and Babul Debnath filed chart sheets under Indian Penal Code Sections 447, 353, 332 and 34 IPC. After filing the chart sheet, the case was handled in the lower court During the trial, the court heard the testimony of 22 witnesses and one of the defendants presented their defense. Later, on 9/12/2021, the court sentenced the defendants to 2 months’ imprisonment and 500 rupees under Sections 447 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (10 more days in default) and to two years’ imprisonment under Sections 353 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Later, the defendants appealed the case to the district and session court after the judgment of the lower court. The defendant’s side in the court was clear that the defendants did not come to the court premises at the time of the incident, but the court mentioned their judgment that there are two types of testimony, one is the court staff. And another witness is an impartial witness The presence of the defendants was found in neutral witnesses and defendants’ printed evidence, and some local court personnel also observed the presence of the defendants. As a result, the case of the defendants was proved in the court, the court expressed his comment that, ‘The court is a temple of justice, the defendants want to close this temple of justice. For this, the honorable court upheld the judgment of the lower court.
